Cases
(PS) Sprague v. Krause et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02026
Defendant: Louis R. Mauro, William J. Murray, Jr. and Peter A. Krause
Plaintiff: Jerome H. Sprague Family Revocable Trust and Jerome H. Sprague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dydzak v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 12-57106
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant: 1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff: Daniel David Dydzak
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Schultz et al v. Krause et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01796
Plaintiff: Kirk Matthew Schultz , Clothes Line Fashions LLC and No Mow Yard Inc
Defendant: Peter W Krause, David Letterman, Bonnie Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kirk Matthew Schultz v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant: Jon Namle, Karen Netherton, Julissa Ortiz and others
Plaintiff: Kirk Matthew Schultz doing business as Whipstocking Idea Co. doing business as No Mow Yard Inc. doing business as Clothes Line Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Michael Ambler v. Jenneil Parks, et al
as 08-16574
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL D. AMBLER
Defendant - Appellee: JENNEIL PARKS, CARL SIMPSON, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and others
Ambler v. Parks et al
as 2:2008cv00884
Plaintiff: Michael D. Ambler
Defendant: Jenneil Parks, Carl Simpson, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?