Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LARKIN v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.et al
as 1:2024cv21063
Plaintiff:
PETER LARKIN
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., d/b/a Norwegian Cruise Line, a Bermuda Company, CARIBBEAN LIFE ADVENTURE SA dba ATV DUNE BUGGY ROATAN ECO-JUNGLE ADVENTURE TOUR and XYZ CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chin et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11481
Plaintiff:
PATRICK FORBES, GAETANO CILENTI, LUCILLE COTINARO and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
James Burt v. Christine De Noyo, et al
as 17-35288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES BURT
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTINE DE NOYO
Defendant:
KEY TRADING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, RAFAEL DE NOYO, DAVID SULLIVAN and others
James Burt v. Christine De Noyo, et al
as 16-36066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BURT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE DE NOYO, KEY TRADING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, RAFAEL DE NOYO and others
Burt v. Key Trading LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00241
Plaintiff:
James Burt
Defendant:
Key Trading LLC, Catherine Larkin, Alyssa Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Burt v. deNoyo, et al.
as 6:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
James Burt
Defendant:
Key Trading LLC, Peter Larkin, Rafael deNoyo and others
Interested Party:
Kevin W. Bons and Jeffrey A. Trautman
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BURT v. KEY TRADING LLC et al
as 2:2012cv06333
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURT
Defendant:
KEY TRADING LLC, DAVID SULLIVAN, CATHERINE LARKIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
DENNIS J. DRASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURT v. DENOYO et al
as 2:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURT
Defendant:
RAFAEL DENOYO, KEY TRADING, LLC, DAVID SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
