Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Peters v. Baca et al
as 2:2018cv00893
Defendant:
Anionov, Isidro Baca, Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wrigley v. Peters et al
as 3:2018cv00135
Defendant:
Peters and Smith
Plaintiff:
Damien Wrigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kefalas v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv00203
Petitioner:
Peter Kefalas
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and The State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Helfrich v. Laxalt et al
as 2:2017cv02392
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, David Gamble, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Peter Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bergna v. Johns et al
as 3:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Peter M. Bergna
Defendant:
Marsha Johns and David Marr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundy v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv01551
Respondent:
Nadia Ahmed, Erin Creegan, Doyle Decker and others
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castellanos v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00902
Defendant:
Peter Castellanos, Adam Paul Laxalt, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintero v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00066
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Carnes and others
Plaintiff:
John Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintero v. Aranan et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Defendant:
Romeo Aranan, Isidro Baca, Connie Bisbee and others
Plaintiff:
John Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. Neven et al
as 2:2016cv01499
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Peter J. Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
