Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Fitz v. Nunez et al
as 3:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Zeferino Ocampo Fitz
Defendant:
Elizabeth Venegas Nunez, Alejandro Aguilera Roman, Alexis Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
World Malayalee Council (America Region) Inc v. Maret et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
World Malayalee Council (America Region) Inc
Defendant:
Philip Maret, Matthew Puthenpurackal, Sudhir Kolath and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tapioca Express, Inc. v. Phat-Quoc (Peter) Ly et al
as 4:2022cv03511
Plaintiff:
Tapioca Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Phat-Quoc (Peter) Ly d/b/a Tapioca Xpress, Danny Ly and Phat-Quoc (Peter) Ly doing business as Tapioca Xpress
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Zendesk, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Zendesk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Constant Contact, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Constant Contact, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Blackbaud, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Blackbaud, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Wix.com, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Wix.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Monday.com, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Monday.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SAP America Inc v. Pedersen
as 3:2022cv01534
Counter Defendant:
SAP America Inc
Defendant:
Peter Pedersen
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peter Pedersen v. Ziff Davis, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Ziff Davis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
