Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Novoa v. Peterson et al
as 4:2018cv00538
Defendant:
Lea Marquez Peterson and Michele Reagan
Plaintiff:
Alice Novoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Federal Trade Commission v. Electronic Payment Solutions of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02535
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Electronic Payment Solutions of America Incorporated, Electronic Payment Services Incorporated, KMA Merchant Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Peterson v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 2:2017cv02073
Plaintiff:
Gaylen A Peterson
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company, Richard H Dozer, Glenn Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson v. Prolific Acuisitions Group LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00727
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
Prolific Acuisitions Group LLC, Jeffrey Licht and Tanya Gordon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Peterson
as 2:2014mc00019
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ryan J Peterson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Crame et al v. 360 Management LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crame and Robert Leatham
Defendant:
360 Management LLC, AAM LLC , Vision Community Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Topolski v. Chris Leef General Agency Incorporated et al
as 2:2012mc00091
Plaintiff:
Annja Topolski
Defendant:
Chris Leef General Agency Incorporated and Gary Peterson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
