Cases 1 - 10 of 15
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as 2:2023cv04711
Plaintiff:
M&D PETERSON, LLC
Defendant:
SIKA AG, SIKA CORPORATION, CHRYSO, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PETERSON
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
NICKOLAS N. PETERSON doing business as TAVERN 618
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
WHITFIELD v. PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
PREFERRED APPARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC., JOEL T MURPHY, HOWARD A MCLURE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
JONES v. WILDCAT et al
as 2:2019cv02493
Defendant:
JUANITA HUGULEY, MELISSA DOUD, NICOLE CHAPMAN-REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff:
ISIAH A. JONES, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BUKSTEL v. HAND et al
as 2:2015cv03951
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BUKSTEL
Defendant:
JEHU HAND, DYLAN STEINBERG , JOHN STAPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Manuel v. NRA Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Peterson Manuel
Defendant:
NRA Group, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETERSON
as 2:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARRY K. PETERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PETERSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00923
Plaintiff:
JAMES PETERSON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SCHWARTZMAN v. JOMAC, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv06027
Plaintiff:
KAMIAN SCHWARTZMAN
Defendant:
JOMAC, LLC, PINNACLE WEALTH GROUP, INC., REALE PARTNERS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PETERSON v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2010cv06988
Plaintiff:
BELINDA PETERSON
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
