Cases 41 - 50 of 230
Rayfield v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06298
Plaintiff:
Chris Rayfield
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Justice, II v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05909
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Whitfield v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05908
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Stanley et al v. Laskawy et al
as 1:2022cv05818
Plaintiff:
Joel Stanley
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
O'Dell v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05803
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Stein v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05737
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Bizzell et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05745
Plaintiff:
Kamiyah Bizzell, Gibran Johnson and Calvin Peterson
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Michael Dalia, William Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ditto et al v. Peterson Properties et al
as 1:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Frank Ditto and Julie Ditto
Defendant:
Peterson Properties, Peterson Property Management, Ted Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Ditto v. Peterson Properties et al
as 1:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
Frank Ditto and Julie Ditto
Defendant:
Peterson Properties, Peterson Property Management, Ted Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Watson v. Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04053
Plaintiff:
Carter Watson
Defendant:
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc., Joel T. Murphy, Howard A. McLure and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
