Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PARKER v. SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
MELINDA PARKER
Defendant:
SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HASTEN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18631
Plaintiff:
JUDITH HASTEN and CARL HASTEN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. et al
as 1:2021cv10159
Defendant:
PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. doing business as SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S. LLC and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. doing business as Walgreens Store #6633
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
VERNON JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD et al v. EISAI, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02439
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CRAWFORD and BRADLEY TREY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ARENA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and EISAI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD et al
as 1:2019md00008
Defendant:
SOLCO HEALTHCARE US, LLC, Huahui U.S., Inc., DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
BARNEY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Venera Lo Re v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv14108
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Patrick Sullivan, MD Sylvia Park, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
Venera Lo Re
In Re:
INVOKANA (CANAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
as 2:2017cv01744
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY NICOLE JAMES
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BAYER PHARMA AG and BAYER OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
