Cases 21 - 30 of 360
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14601
Plaintiff:
JASON PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14518
Plaintiff:
KYLE PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09940
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. PHELPS et al
as 8:2023cv00579
Defendant:
NICHOLAS PHELPS, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07029
Plaintiff:
ADAM PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 23-12959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Dancy v. Stephens et al
as 5:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
FNU Stephens, FNU DeAngelo, FNU Pachuilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gorbey v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Brian J. Davis, Federal Bureau of Prisions, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14143
Plaintiff:
BOBBY PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
