Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Bonilla v. Kaufman et al
as 3:2017cv01327
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Ira R. Kaufman, T. Phelps and Dborah Norrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnam v. Infoblox, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv05107
Plaintiff:
Korey Burnam
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc., Robert D. Thomas, Remo E. Canessa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps v. United States Of America
as 5:2013cv05627
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03160
Plaintiff:
Oscar Torres , Doris Lawson , Russell Randol and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Pecial_master:
Belinda Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gustafson et al v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 3:2012cv05033
Plaintiff:
Andrea Gustafson , Darby Gustafson , Donald Gustafson and others
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2012cv03911
Plaintiff:
James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morris v. Drummond et al
as 3:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
Orville M. Morris
Defendant:
G. Drummond, D. Baughman, S. M. Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. United States Of America
as 5:2012cv00063
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. et al v. Cookerly et al
as 4:2011cv03263
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas Raymond Cookerly, Michael James O'Brien, Michael Shawn Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
