Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Stokes v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Darwin L. Stokes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Doctor Becker, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stalker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stalker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Chad Jennings and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Wexford et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Myles
Defendant:
Wexford, Dr. Becker, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoultz v. Loy et al
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Frank Shoultz
Defendant:
Warden Loy, Dr Becker and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Michael Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Alvarez
Defendant:
Michael Trucking, Inc., Romuald Adamczyk and Phil Kiszkiel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Moore v. Sennings et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo T Moore
Defendant:
Chad Sennings, Loy Williams, Dr Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrow v. Loy et al
as 3:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
William L. Sharrow
Defendant:
Bill Loy, Phil Marten and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Haine et al
as 3:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
Diandre Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas A. Haine, Morgan Hudson and Phil Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
