Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stalker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stalker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Chad Jennings and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Wexford et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Myles
Defendant:
Wexford, Dr. Becker, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoultz v. Loy et al
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Frank Shoultz
Defendant:
Warden Loy, Dr Becker and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Sennings et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo T Moore
Defendant:
Chad Sennings, Loy Williams, Dr Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWhorter v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Brandt McWhorter
Defendant:
Phil Martin, Josh Lane, David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bravieri v Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
Richard Bravieri
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, Dr Phil Martin, Dr Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chittick v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chittick
Defendant:
Rachael Dodd, Josh Lane and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frakes v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 2:2019cv02158
Defendant:
. Ritz, . Young, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
William Frakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
