Cases 1 - 10 of 3,105
Hearns et al v. MEJ Plumbing, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60434
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hearns, Jr., Danel Phillips, Ernesto Dimitrie and others
Defendant:
MEJ Plumbing, LLC, Jason Cohen, Eric Lazar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PHILLIPS v. CITY OF WILLISTON
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILLISTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
U.S. Bank v. Phillips et al
as 9:2024cv80326
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank
Defendant:
Lynn Phillips and Jeffrey Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
SARAH PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Wayne Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Phillips v. Hendry County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nigel Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Hendry County Jail, Officer Jones, Officer Croswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Phillips
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daughtry, Phillip v. Parret
as 2:2024cv14111
Plaintiff:
Phillip Junior Daughtry
Defendant:
John Parret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
