Cases 1 - 10 of 272
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 24-2427
Plaintiff:
FIRST AND ROSEMARY SENIOR HOUSING, LP
Defendant:
GEORGE PIERRE
Pierre v. Garland, et al.
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
ANTONIO EDIOR PIERRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and M. BOWEN, Warden
Smith v. Haight-Biehler, et al.
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
PIERRE SMITH
Defendant:
HEIDI HAIGHT-BIEHLER, Medical Doctor, BASS, First Name Unknown, HSA, Health Services Administrator, BULGER, First Name Unknown, MLP, Health Services Professional and others
Pierre v. Brewer, et al.
as 23-4307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RAY PIERRE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA BREWER and DOES, 1-10 inclusive
Trendsettah USA, Inc., et al. v. Swisher International Group Inc., et al.
as 23-4257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENDSETTAH USA, INC. and TRENDSETTAH, INC.
Claimant:
BEACONSTAR INC
Defendant / Appellee:
SWISHER INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC.
Respondent:
SALAH KUREH
Petitioner:
GITANO PIERRE BRYANT and LAW FINANCE GROUP, LLC
Martinez Avalos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4060
Petitioner:
OSCAR MARTINEZ AVALOS, CONSTANTINA DEL CARMEN RAMIREZ LIMO, JEAN PIERRE MARTINEZ RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Donald Ray Pierre v. Marcia Brewer et al
as 2:2023cv07220
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Pierre
Defendant:
Marcia Brewer and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner:
JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
