Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Yellets v. Gu et al
as 1:2022cv00156
Nominal Defendant:
Hyzon Motors Inc. and Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lyle Yellets
Defendant:
George Gu, Craig Knight, Erik Anderson and others
Sovereign v. Urovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
James Hindman, Pierre Legault, James A. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sovereign
Truinject Corp. v. Nestle S.A. et al
as 1:2020cv01675
Defendant:
David Lee, Hanh Pham, Galderma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett W. Truinject Corp. and Trueinject Corp.
Petitioner:
Beus Gilbert McGroder, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Rumsey v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00650
Plaintiff:
Robert Rumsey
Defendant:
Pierre Laubies, Robert Singer, Erhard Schoewel and others
Phillips v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00628
Defendant:
Pierre Laubies, Robert Singer, Erhard Schoewel and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Phillips
Franchi v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00805
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Peter Van Vlasselaer, Xiangmin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Seeman v. Schulman et al
as 1:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Steve Seeman
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman , John D. Rainey , Patrick L.A. Dupuis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pierre v. Beebe Hospital / Medical Center et al
as 1:2013cv02102
Plaintiff:
Raymond Pierre
Defendant:
Beebe Hospital / Medical Center, Beebe Medial Center Pavillion, Jacquelyn O. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
Mark Jackson
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company, Rohm and Haas Company Benefits Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
