Labor Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Zanchelli et al v. Skanska USA Civil Northeast, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff: Carl Zanchelli as TRUSTEES of The Dock Builders, Pier Carpenters, Shorers, House Movers, Pile Drivers, Divers, Tenders And Foundation And Marine Constructors Local Union No. 1456 Membership Relief Benefit, Brian McLaughlin as TRUSTEES of The Dock Builders, Pier Carpenters, Shorers, House Movers, Pile Drivers, Divers, Tenders And Foundation And Marine Constructors Local Union No. 1456 Membership Relief Benefit, Adam Harkin as TRUSTEES of The Dock Builders, Pier Carpenters, Shorers, House Movers, Pile Drivers, Divers, Tenders And Foundation And Marine Constructors Local Union No. 1456 Membership Relief Benefit Pla and others
Defendant: Skanska USA Civil Northeast, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Victor Saume as TRUSTEES of The Dock Builders, Pier Carpenters, Shorers, House Movers, Pile Drivers, Divers, Tenders And Foundation And Marine Constructors Local Union No. 1456 Membership Relief Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Gayle v. Harry's Nurses Registry
as 21-1463
Plaintiff / Appellee: Maud Samedi, Debbie Ann Bromfield, Rose-Marie Zephirin and others
Defendant / Appellant: Harry's Nurses Registry, Harry Dorvilien and Harry Dorvilier
Neurological Surgery, P.C. et al v. Citibank N.A.
as 2:2015cv06903
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Neurological Surgery, P.C., John Pile-Spellman, M.D. and Lee Eric Tessler, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Neurological Surgery, P.C. et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 2:2015cv06772
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Plaintiff: Neurological Surgery, P.C. and John Pile-Spellman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of Empire State Carpenters Annuity, Apprenticeship, Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds v. Oneidaview Pile Driving Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03357
Respondent: Oneidaview Pile Driving Inc.
Petitioner: Trustees of Empire State Carpenters Annuity, Apprenticeship, Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund et al v. Oneidaview Pile Driving, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00512
Plaintiff: Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund , Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund , Upstate New York Engineers S.U.B. Fund and others
Defendant: Oneidaview Pile Driving, Inc. and Kimberly A. Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
The New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Oneioda View Pile Driving Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04104
Plaintiff: The New York City District Council of Carpenters
Defendant: Oneioda View Pile Driving Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Chung v. S.D. Int'l, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04638
Defendant: 777 Trading, Inc:, John Doe Corp., S.D. Int'l, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Pow C. Chung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Training Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO v. Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2013cv00101
Plaintiff: Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Training Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO
Defendant: Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gayle v. Harry's Nurses Registry, Inc.
as 12-4764
Plaintiff - Appellee: Claudia Gayle, Indivdiually, On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and as Class Representative, Aline Antenor, Anne C. DePasquale and others
Defendant: Harry's Nurses Registry, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Harry Dorvilien

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?