Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Leyva v. Bascai, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Leyva
Defendant:
Bascai, Inc., DOES 1-10 and Kao Chi Ping Chen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHEN et al v. RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02591
Plaintiff:
DAN DAN CHEN, MEI FENG LIN, XUE RAN HUANG and others
Defendant:
RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. D/B/A HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET, HE PING CHEN, QI YUN CHEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pan v. Mcgriff et al
as 2:2022cv07109
Defendant:
US Foods of Illinois, Robert Leon Mcgriff, Trans-porte, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ping-Chen Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pan v. Mcgriff et al
as 1:2022cv07109
Plaintiff:
Ping-Chen Pan
Defendant:
Robert Leon Mcgriff, Trans-porte, Inc. and US Foods of Illinois a/k/a US Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 4:2021cv03531
Plaintiff:
Lap-Ping Chen
Defendant:
BNW of North America, LLC and BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
