Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Placid Refining Company LLC v. EPA
as 23-1256
Petitioner:
Placid Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 23-1243
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Placid Refining Company LLC v. JA Dakis Capital, LLC dba Global Oil Bunkering et al
as 6:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Placid Refining Company LLC
Defendant:
JA Dakis Capital, LLC dba Global Oil Bunkering and Petros Kalamaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1279
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1228
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Placid Refining Company LLC v. EPA
as 22-1196
Petitioner:
Placid Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Placid Refining Company LLC v. EPA
as 22-1134
Petitioner:
Placid Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Growth Energy v. EPA, et al
as 22-1127
Petitioner:
Growth Energy
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator
Intervenor:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, American Refining Group, Inc. and others
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1051
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Placid Refining Company LLC v. EPA
as 20-1477
Petitioner:
Placid Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
