Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:1999mc09999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
In re: Seroquel XR (Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc., AstraZeneca UK Limited, Handa Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JM Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, Rite Aid Hdqtrs Corp., Walgreen Co. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Hy-Vee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Imerys Talc America, Inc.
as 1:2019mc00103
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Debtor:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff:
Lanier Plaintiffs, Certain Talc Plaintiffs and Bart Harris and the Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Cases
Respondent:
Donna and Jerry Farra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
PAYMENT OF ANNUAL PRO HAC VICE FEE
as 1:1977mc07777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)
as 1:1999mc09999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY ADMISSION FEES - 2018
as 1:1988mc08888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01717
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)
as 1:1999mc09999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
PAYMENT OF ANNUAL PRO HAC VICE FEE
as 1:1977mc07777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY ADMISSION FEES - 2017
as 1:1988mc08888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: Miscellaneous Case Cause not Known
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
