Cases 1 - 10 of 2,983
Suffolk County v. Corrado
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
SUFFOLK COUNTY, DIANE ZIELENSKI, NATALIE WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CORRADO
IN RE: Passenger Vehicle Replacement Tires Antitrust Litigation
as MDL NO. 3107
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Carroll v. Pitkonen, et al.
as 24-2522
Plaintiff:
CURTIS-GENE CARROLL, Aggrieved Plaintiff, Sui Juris
Defendant:
TUYET PITKONEN, MARK HODGSON, Attorney, SHAUN HUPPERT, Attorney and others
Lau v. NYSARC Trust Services, Inc.
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
GILBERT LAU
Defendant:
DOROTHY ZYSKOWSKI, Director of Trusts, JAMIE HARLA, Team Leader-Trust Administrator, NYSARC TRUST SERVICES, INC. and others
IN RE: Yu Luo Shelf Bracket ('683) Patent Litigation
as MDL NO. 3118
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Woodruff, et al. v. Google LLC
as 24-2479
Petitioner:
KIMBERLEY WOODRUFF, MEAGHAN DELAHUNTY, MEGHAN CORNELIUS and others
Respondent:
GOOGLE LLC
Erickson, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 24-2498
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERICKSON and SHELLEY ANN ERICKSON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and its employees and or agents, REBECCA DIETRICH, in her individual capacity, and employee and.or agent for and as successor in interest and the Plaintiffs mortgage successor in interest WAMU other JP Morgan Chase NA, TARA L. TUCKER, notary in her individual capacity and employee and/or agent for other JP Morgan Chase and others
In RE: Walker Edison Furniture Company
as 2:2024mc00276
Not Yet Classified:
Walker Edison Furniture Company
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant:
Defendant Placeholder
IN RE: Lawrence L. Crawford Litigation
as MDL NO. 3116
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
IN RE: New York Tax Foreclosure Surplus Litigation
as MDL NO. 3117
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
