Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Willis et al v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00819
Plaintiff:
Donald Willis and Viola Willis
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc., BW/IP, Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sundeen v. B.F. Goodrich Company et al
as 3:2012cv01578
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin, McDonnell Douglas Corp., B.F. Goodrich Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Navistar, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Paccar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Norvin Sundeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Willis et al v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
Donald Willis and Viola Willis
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. , BW/IP, Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Crane, Co.
Cross_defendant:
BW/IP, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00540
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Yarway Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Brantley and Lisa Grande
Cross Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Flowserve Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bell et al v. Arvin Meritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Donald Bell and Sumiko Bell
Defendant:
Arvin Meritor, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part:
Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation:
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co:
CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation:
Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc:
Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation:
Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International:
Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation:
Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation:
Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company:
Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor:
Zurn Industries LLC
Stallcop et al v. Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05049
Plaintiff:
Floyd Stallcop , Linda Stallcop and Northrop Grumman
Defendant:
Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation , Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stallcop et al v. Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv05049
Plaintiff:
Floyd Stallcop , Linda Stallcop and Northrop Grumman
Defendant:
Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation , Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04495
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04495
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
