Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02579
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Prater
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LM General Insurance Company v. Pacheco et al
as 3:2021cv00572
Defendant:
Tina Pacheco, Michael D Ellis, Timoniqua Tishay Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
LM General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philippe v. Harms et al
as 1:2020cv01213
Defendant:
. Harms, John Doe, . Prater and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Philippe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Calhoun et al
as 3:2018cv03308
Defendant:
Officer Norton, Beatrice Calhoun, Christina McGrew and others
Plaintiff:
Rashonda Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00608
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Geney J. Prater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Curl Prater v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Samantha Curl Prater
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiffs in re: Depakote v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs in re: Depakote , Susan Harris, Kelly Dawn Kelley and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01473
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Justin Hammers, James Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regassa v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
K. Sanders, R. Baskerville, C. Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
