Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bang et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Young Tae Bang and Eun Ha Joo
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Jesus Elias Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stone v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Michael Stone
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Gabriel P Guillermo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Peterson et al v. Hall et al
as 2:2017cv01860
Defendant:
Telicia Da'Shanee Hall and New Prime, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Peterson and Charlotte-Marie Smith-Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Osckel et al v. Pardee et al
as 2:2011cv00154
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. , MI and Randy James Pardee
Plaintiff:
Edward Osckel and Tonya Osckel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Maciol et al v. Steele et al
as 2:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
Debora Maciol and Randal Zussman
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. , MO and Joseph Robert Steele , KS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NewPage Wisconsin System Inc. v. CMS Energy Resource Management Company et al
as 2:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
NewPage Wisconsin System Inc.
Defendant:
CMS Energy Resource Management Company, CMS Energy Corporation, Cantera Gas Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arandell Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv01019
Plaintiff:
Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp. and others
Defendant:
Xcel Energy Inc., Xcel Energy Inc., Northern States Power Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00987
Plaintiff:
Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing & Trading Company, LP, Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
