Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Parks v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adam N Parks
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Delaney et al
as 2:2011cv00678
Defendant:
Larry E. Carter, Jackie K. Delaney, Rick Dreshler and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Deruise et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Adolph Deruise and Clara Jane Deruise
Defendant:
Vince Johnson and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Azpilcueta v. The State of Nevada, ex. rel. Transportation Authority et al
as 3:2009cv00593
Plaintiff:
Daiana Azpilcueta
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, ex. rel. Transportation Authority, Department of Public Safety, Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Martinez-Cornelio et al
as 2:2008cv01452
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Miriam Martinez-Cornelio, Brittney Lee Gebow and Tara Thornton
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Akbari et al
as 2:2008cv01245
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marshall Akbari and Brooke Luciano
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Mark Allen Thomas, et al
as 2:2007cv01341
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mark Allen Thomas, Thomas Plumbing, Inc., Thomas Plumbing Sewer & Drain Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
