Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Mims et al
as 1:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Larry Dwayne Mims, Paula Denise Traylor, Dazia M. Fumbah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Rogers et al
as 3:2009cv00911
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda Rogers, Kathleen Sebelius, Alabama Medicaid Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc v. Ray et al
as 3:2009cv01169
Plaintiff:
Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc
Defendant:
Allen Ray, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gosnell et al v. Bennett et al
as 2:2008cv02359
Plaintiff:
James Gosnell, James Gosnell, Rebecca Gosnell and others
Defendant:
Allen F Bennett and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cross Claimant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Allen F Bennett and Allen F Bennett
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Saqqaf et al v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv02223
Plaintiff:
Hameed Al Saqqaf, Hameed Al Saqqaf, Semyr Y Nagi and others
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ross et al v. Lester et al
as 2:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jerome Ross and Ernestine Ross
Defendant:
Tony Lester, Tony Lester and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shaw v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv00718
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shaw
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
