Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. State of Utah, et al.
as 25-6196
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.
as 25-6212
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, et al.
as 25-6193
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servic and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, et al.
as 25-5109
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS, HUMANE WORLD ACTION FUND and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor:
SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, STATE OF UTAH, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and others
Animal Wellness Action et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
The Gallatin Wildlife Association, The Center for a Humane Economy, Footloose Montana and others
Defendant:
Martha Williams, Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, The Kettle Range Conservation Group, Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Interior, Martha Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor:
Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Amicus Curiae:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services et al
as 3:2019cv05362
Plaintiff:
Project Coyote/Earth Island Institute, Center for Biological Diversity and Animal Legal Defense Fund
Defendant:
Janet L. Bucknall and USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, et al
as 1:2017cv03564
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, Animal Legal Defense Fund, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
William H. Clay and USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. USDA, et al
as 17-35508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE-WILDLIFE SERVICES, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and DAVID WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Oregon State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Charles Mark, et al
as 17-35461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, CASCADIA WILDLANDS, KOOTENAI ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. MARK, in his official capacity and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
