Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Liberty Property Limited Partnership et al v. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Liberty Property Limited Partnership and ProLogis, Inc.
Defendant:
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. ProLogis, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00009
Petitioner:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Respondent:
ProLogis, Inc., Raul Saldana and Joshua Levine
Liberty Property Limited Partnership et al v. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
as 2:2023cv07628
Plaintiff:
Liberty Property Limited Partnership, ProLogis, Inc. and Prologis Inc.
Defendant:
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Curtis v. Prologis, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07833
Plaintiff:
Marcey Curtis
Defendant:
Prologis, Inc., Hamid R. Moghadam, Irving F. Lyons, III and others
Bushansky v. Prologis, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04320
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Prologis, Inc., Hamid R. Moghadam, Irving F. Lyons, III and others
CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control et al., v. Exxon Mobil Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Inc., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Thompson v. Liberty Property Trust et al
as 1:2019cv02230
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, William Hankowsky, Lambda OP Acquisition LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Rosenblatt v. DCT Industrial Trust Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01678
Defendant:
Marcus L. Smith, Philip L. Hawkins, Thomas F. August and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
