Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
VELEZ v. MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04767
Plaintiff: BRITTANY VELEZ
Defendant: MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS, LLC and OMAR CARRILLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS et al v. SAMANGO et al
as 2:2020cv00375
Defendant: PROVIDENCE STEEL CO., INC. and JOSEPH SAMANGO
Plaintiff: IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELHPIA AND VICINITY) PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCED IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 405 IMPACT FUND, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCED IRONWORKERS LOCAL 405 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BURMEISTER v. UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION
as 3:2018cv00135
Defendant: UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: JOHN BURMEISTER
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
WROTEN v. ASSOCIATES FOR WOMEN'S MEDICINE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02441
Plaintiff: EDWARD WROTEN
Defendant: ASSOCIATES FOR WOMEN'S MEDICINE , PROFESSIONAL PROVIDERS and THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WARNER v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv00723
Plaintiff: ROBERT H. WARNER
Defendant: PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GERMAN et al v. PROVIDER'S CHOICE AMBULANCE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04421
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA GERMAN and DAVID MIRANDA
Defendant: PROVIDER'S CHOICE AMBULANCE, INC., GARY DUBIN and JOSE LUGO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SHEPHERD v. PROVIDER'S CHOICE AMBULANCE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02840
Plaintiff: DVIDA SHEPHERD
Defendant: PROVIDER'S CHOICE AMBULANCE, INC. , GARY DUBIN and JOSE LUGO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SCHVABENITZ v. UNUM PROVIDENT
as 2:2010cv00492
Plaintiff: DAVID SCHVABENITZ
Defendant: UNUM PROVIDENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRECHAK v. SETON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00227
Plaintiff: PERRY TRECHAK
Defendant: SETON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, SETON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN TO PROVIDE PRE-TRA 86 BENEFITS, PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, SETON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN TO PROVIDE PRE-TRA 86 BENEFITS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ADKINS v. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN OF PROVIDENT BANK et al
as 2:2009cv04625
Plaintiff: GAY ADKINS
Defendant: FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN OF PROVIDENT BANK and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?