Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 76 of 76
GILBERTSON v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 4:2009cv00105
Plaintiff: PAMELA GILBERTSON and PAMELA GILBERTSON
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Plaintiff
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. MARTIN et al
as 4:2009cv00047
Plaintiff: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: GEORGE W. MARTIN, III and RYAN N. EATHERLY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
NESSUS et al v. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN et al
as 1:2007cv01405
Plaintiff: JERRY NESSUS and ANGELA MANAWAT
Defendant: ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN, WALMART STORES, INC., THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CUMMINGS v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00765
Plaintiff: JANET CUMMINGS
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ROBBINS v. MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN et al
as 1:2007cv00248
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROBBINS
Defendant: MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Apt v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company et al
as 3:2007cv00044
Estate Plaintiff: Susan Jane Apt
Defendant: Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Northern Indiana Public Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?