Cases 1 - 5 of 5
County of Rockland, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 7:2019cv05588
Plaintiff:
County of Rockland, New York
Defendant:
Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv04750
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Teamster Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund and Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv06916
Plaintiff:
New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund, New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund, New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Fredrick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
