Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ningbo Futai Electric Limited v. QVC, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01768
Counter Defendant: Ningbo Futai Electric Limited
Defendant: QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
STONY BATTERY RD PROPERTY OWNER LLC et al v. QVC, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00518
Plaintiff: STONY BATTERY RD PROPERTY OWNER LLC and STONY CORP. BLVD. LLC
Defendant: QVC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTIER v. QURATE RETAIL GROUP, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff: Martino Cartier
Defendant: Qurate Retail Group, Inc., HSN, Inc., HSNi, INc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
MORSAM FASHIONS INC v. QVC INC
as 2:2022cv03988
Plaintiff: MORSAM FASHIONS INC
Defendant: QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gaffney et al v. QVC INC
as 2:2022mc00010
Petitioner: Alan Gaffney, Nicole Gaffney and Derek Gaffney
Respondent: QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Gaffney et al v. QVC INC
as 2:2022cv00488
Petitioner: Alan Gaffney, Nicole Gaffney and Derek Gaffney
Respondent: QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03965
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ADAMS v. QVC, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00646
Defendant: QVC, INC.
Plaintiff: LANITRA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?