Cases 11 - 20 of 191
Rasesh Shah, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated, et al
as 23-80025
Respondent:
RASESH SHAH, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, METZLER ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH and SJUNDE AP-FONDEN
Petitioner:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, STEVE MOLLENKOPF, PAUL E. JACOBS and others
UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 23-1296
Appellant:
UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED and ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Apple Inc.
as 23-1209
Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Apple Inc.
as 23-1208
Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Appellee:
APPLE INC.
UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 22-2250
Appellant:
UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED and ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
In re Application for Issuance of Letters Rogatory by Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V. et al
as 3:2022mc01241
Respondent:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Petitioner:
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH and Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Assistance to Foreign Tribunals (incl letter rogatory)
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
as 22-1824
Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
as 22-1825
Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION
Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 22-1829
Appellant:
INTEL CORPORATION
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
as 22-1828
Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
