Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Braunstein v. Feil et al
as 2:2016cv02062
Defendant:
K Belanber, Quentin Byrne, Joseph Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Braunstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reberger v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00269
Defendant:
Michelle Ashcraft, Baker, E. Boardman and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almy v. Adams
as 3:2016cv00231
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Dr. Aranas, R. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosky v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Respondent:
Quentin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
John H. Rosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00124
Respondent:
Quentin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Leodias Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00104
Respondent:
Quentin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kenneth Maurice Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hulsey v. Byrne
as 3:2016cv00069
Respondent:
Quentin Byrne
Petitioner:
Ronald Hulsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Cox et al
as 3:2016cv00037
Defendant:
Angus, Arianas, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedman v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00016
Defendant:
Quentin Byrne, David Carpenter, Pamela Del Porto and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmajzoub v. Byrne et al
as 3:2015cv00624
Respondent:
Quentin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Said Elmajzoub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
