Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grun v. R&L Carriers Inc
as 3:2022cv02696
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Grun
Defendant:
R&L Carriers, Inc., R&L Carriers Inc, R&L Carriers Shared Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hall v. R & L Carriers Shared Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00958
Defendant:
R & L Carriers Group Benefit Plan, R & L Carriers Shared Services LLC Texas Injury Benefit Plan, Scott Armour and others
Plaintiff:
Josef B Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wiltz v. R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv04660
Plaintiff:
Milton Wiltz
Defendant:
R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01762
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, R&L Carriers Payroll, LLC and R&L Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodgers et al v. R & L Carriers Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
Ben Rodgers and Wendy Rodgers
Defendant:
R & L Carriers Inc , R & L Carriers Shared Services LLC and Hyster-Yale Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vandeventer v. R&L Carriers Shared Services LLC
as 3:2015cv02230
Plaintiff:
Robert T Vandeventer
Defendant:
R&L Carriers Shared Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
