Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Montoya v. Cava et al
as 1:2023cv21015
Plaintiff:
Andres Felipe Montoya
Defendant:
Daniella Levine Cava, The Miami-Dade Police Department, Alfredo Ramirez, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptiste v. Perez Espinosa
as 1:2023cv20935
Plaintiff:
Sonnfred Baptiste
Defendant:
Nivia R Perez Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Elite Aluminum Corporation v. Classic Metals Suppliers Corp et al
as 9:2022cv81765
Defendant:
Classic Metals Suppliers Corp, Classic Metals Panels, Classic Metals Suppliers and Manufacturers and others
Plaintiff:
Elite Aluminum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
PEREZ-LAMBOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18193
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS R PEREZ-LAMBOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pimienta et al v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv14165
Plaintiff:
Publio R. Perez and Milagros Pimienta
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mony Life Insurance Company v. Perez
as 8:2019cv02030
Plaintiff:
Mony Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bernard R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mony Life Insurance Company v. Perez
as 8:2019cv02031
Plaintiff:
Mony Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bernard R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Mony Life Insurance Company
as 8:2018cv02123
Defendant:
Mony Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bernard R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caplan v. AUTOTECH ALARM PEOPLE CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv23285
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
HECTOR R. PEREZ, DAISY G. PEREZ and AUTOTECH ALARM PEOPLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Perez v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2017cv22018
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Perez
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
