Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Acosta v. AWP, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
AWP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Casa Real Bistro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01360
Defendant:
Gerardo Ortiz, Casa Real Bistro, Inc. and Luciana Ortiz
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Maru Grand Rapids, LLC, et al.
as 1:2018cv01175
Defendant:
Maru Restaurant LLC, Maru East Lansing, LLC, Maru Midland, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. WESTSHORE MEDICAL PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC.,
as 1:2018cv00942
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
WESTSHORE MEDICAL PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. Los Amigos of Kalamazoo, Inc., et al.
as 1:2018cv00746
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Ortiz, Francisco Hernandez, Rosa Bravo and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. New Image Landscaping, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
New Image Landscaping, LLC and Jeremy Cizauskas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Orshal Company L.L.C. et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Orshal Company L.L.C. , Ken Orshal and Gerald Losinski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. American Classic Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
American Classic Construction, Inc. , Nathan Thompson , Jacob Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. CSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
CSP, Inc. , Raj Patel 1, Inc. , Mehul Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. and Li Yong Dong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
