Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jeremiassen v. Punta Mita Homeowners Association
as 2:2018ms00031
Defendant:
Joseph R. Francis, Path Media Holdings, LLC, Punta Mita Homeowners Association and others
In Re:
GGW Brands, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Jeremiassen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Francis v. Spearman
as 3:2018cv01326
Petitioner:
Carlos R. Francis
Respondent:
M. E. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: GGW Brands, LLC, et al
as 13-57127
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GGW BRANDS, LLC
Appellant:
PATH MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC, JOSEPH R. FRANCIS, ARGYLE ONLINE, LLC and others
Appellee:
GGW BRANDS, LLC, GGW MARKETING, LLC, GGW DIRECT, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07666
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04162
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wynn Las Vegas LLC v. GGW Direct, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02066
Defendant:
Blue Horse Trading, LLC, David R. Houston, Ltd., Joseph R Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Wynn Las Vegas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Joseph Francis v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, et al
as 12-55858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. FRANCIS, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, DBA Wynn Las Vegas, STEPHEN A. WYNN, an individual and BARBARA CONWAY, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00337
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph R Francis v. Wynn Las Vegas LLC et al
as 2:2011cv09054
Defendant:
Barbara Conway, Does, Stephen A Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Francis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
