Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Agapito Diaz-Vasquez, Jr. v. R. Rackley
as 13-16702
Petitioner - Appellant: AGAPITO DIAZ-VASQUEZ, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: R. J. RACKLEY
Woods v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv06052
Petitioner: Regnaldo A. Woods
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrishow v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02892
Petitioner: Earl Morrishow, Jr.
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexios Alexander v. CDCR, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-17397
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALEXIOS ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE GUIRBINO and others
McClung v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02691
Petitioner: Tony McClung
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClung v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01741
Petitioner: Tony McClung
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harold E White v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2012cv09092
Respondent: People of the State of California and R J Rackley
Petitioner: Harold E White
Smith v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02572
Petitioner: Christopher Smith
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv05191
Petitioner: Christopher Smith
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamal Thompson v. R. J. Rackley, et al
as 12-56686
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMAL THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee: R. J. RACKLEY and THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?