Cases 41 - 50 of 52
ACOSTA v. WASHINGTON SQUARE RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LP et al
as 2:2017cv04594
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
WASHINGTON SQUARE RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LP and AIMEE OLEXY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. FAIRMOUNT FOUNDRY, INC.
as 5:2017cv04302
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
FAIRMOUNT FOUNDRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Acosta v. Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,
as 3:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
ACOSTA v. HEART II HEART, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
HEART II HEART, LLC and TONI CHANDLER DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
ACOSTA v. ELITE LINEN, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03476
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ELITE LINEN, LLC and JONATHAN LEVINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AMBULANCE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03454
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AMBULANCE INC., ART OF LIFE, INC., EZ TRANS ENTERPRISE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. CAMBRIDGE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES, LLC
as 2:2017cv03038
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ACOSTA v. SX MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
SX MANAGEMENT, LLC, STEVEN MITNICK and EDMOND MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Alexander's Salon & Spa, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00902
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Alexander's Salon & Spa, Inc., Alexander's in the Woods, LLC and Sherrilyn Tarapchak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. PPS Preservation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
PPS Preservation, Inc. and Nick Potochnick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
