Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones et al v. Barrett et al
as 3:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Jones and Connie Jones
Defendant:
Steven R. Barrett, Wayne E. Glasser, Harbor Foods, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Brent Jones and P2W, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Mack v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv01984
Defendant:
Warden Brian Williams, Adam Paul Laxalt, Dwayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 19-17169
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, GOVERNMENT, JENNIFER NASH, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Victor Tagle v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 19-16531
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTINGER, ESP Senior Guard, KARNEZ, NDOC Informant/Inmate, RESEE WALDREN, NDOC Informant/Inmate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE
Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2018cv00522
Defendant:
Mumpower, Clayton, Mesa and others
Plaintiff:
Teron Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00569
Defendant:
AMPD TV MP3 Company, Romeo Aranas, Arguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Teron Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Barren v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-16316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN, J. NASH, D. FIERRO and others
Victor Tagle v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 17-15110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Manuel Tagle-Moreno
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, ARTINGER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
