Cases 1 - 10 of 36
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22335
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. Baker et al
as 5:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Steve Venkins and Steve Everette Jenkins
Defendant:
R. Baker and FNU Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Carlton
as 1:2021cv22809
Plaintiff:
Dean Baker and Dean R. Baker
Defendant:
Warden E. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv00528
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY R BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serio v. Floriscape, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01368
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA SERIO
Defendant:
DAVID B BAKER, FLORISCAPE LLC, JENNIFER R BAKER and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mark Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06489
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROHAN R BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58273
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROHAN R BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2019cv02685
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Baker, Steven Ratton, Xandre Brown and others
Defendant:
Grady C. Judd, Jr. and Polk County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Orange County)
as 6:2019cv01733
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Nevin R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv01452
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Carter, Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
