Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Gibson v. R. Gonzales, et al
as 20-16001
Defendant:
CARBONE, Correctional Officer, R. BINKELE, Deputy Warden, J. MCCALL, Correctional Administrator and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY AYERS, Adult Education Teacher, STEVENSON, Correctional Lieutenant, BOJORQUEZ, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. GIBSON
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. E. Santana, et al
as 19-16985
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ATCHLEY, Captain, S. PEDONE, E. SHERMAN, Lt. W. Commander and others
Defendant:
S. PONDE, Reviewing Supervisor and RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Willie Watkins v. R. Binkele
as 19-56068
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE LOUIS WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. BINKELE
Antonio Williams v. G. Ramey, et al
as 18-15896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LUIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. RAMEY, P. SULLIVAN, R. BINKELE and others
Antonio Williams v. Carmona, et al
as 18-15895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LUIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMONA, Correctional Officer, SCARLETT, Sergeant, P. GARCIA and others
Michael Hicks v. R. Binkele, et al
as 17-16174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BINKELE, Associate Warden, H. AGUILERA, Correctional Counselor, R. PARIN, Correctional Administrator and others
Armando Aceves v. R. Binkele
as 17-15626
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARMANDO ABREU ACEVES, AKA Armando Abreu
Respondent - Appellee:
R. BINKELE
Tuanja Anderson v. M. Voong, et al
as 17-15573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. VOONG, R. BINKELE, K. GREEN and others
Enrique Diaz v. M. Perez, et al
as 13-16104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
M. PEREZ, R. A. KESSLER, R. BINKELE and others
Arthur Parnell, III v. A. Tucker, et al
as 10-16044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR PARNELL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
A. TUCKER, Associate Warden, T. KRENKE, Lt., R. BINKELE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
