Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shallowhorn v. Lopez, et al.
as 24-2484
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
R. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, Y. CASTILLO, Correctional officer, H. MOSELEY, Correctional Officer and others
Woodson v. Carranza et al
as 3:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Dane E. Woodson
Defendant:
T. Carranza, J. Casares, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Haisani Reynolds v. Raymond Madden, et al
as 22-55351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAISANI REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Warden, ROCK JOHNSON, (A) Warden, FELIX M. VASQUEZ, (AD) and others
Reynolds v. Madden et al
as 3:2021cv00955
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, Felix M. Vasquez, Raymond Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Haisani Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kohen Uhuru v. Chaplain Hadjaj, et al
as 20-55550
Defendant / Appellee:
M. LUKASIK, Psychologist Supervisor, O'DELL, CCI, Custody Case Worker/Counselor at ICC-UCC, S. SANCHEZ, Captain in Ad Seg at the RJD Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU
Uhuru v. Hadjaj et al
as 3:2019cv02343
Defendant:
M. Valakantjis, Captain Garza, Lt. B. Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sconce v. Carruth et al
as 3:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
David Sconce
Defendant:
Sonya Carruth, R. Olivarria, E. Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv00942
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo , R. Din , Bracamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Schwartzmiller v. K. Rodriguez, et al
as 18-55433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (RJD), JOHN LARSON, NBC News Correspondent, NBC NEWS and others
Bradford v. Zhang et al
as 2:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
R. Zhang, C. Liuato, Ferrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
