Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Team Enterprises, LLC v. Western Investment Real Estate, et al
as 10-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEAM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
WESTERN INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE TRUST, AKA Western Properties Trust and WPT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
PK II CENTURY CENTER LP, PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC., as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Western Investment Real Estate Trust, KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION, as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and others
Third-party-defendant:
CITY OF MODESTO
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, et al
as 10-15951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant:
CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 10-15605
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant:
ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant:
TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 10-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant:
ALBERT ANGIOLI and BURNELL ANGIOLI
Defendant - Appellee:
MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC LLC and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant:
CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Transport Insurance Company v. R.R. Street & Co. Inc., et al
as 10-55404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
R.R. STREET & CO. INC. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, individually and as subrogee of R.R. Street & Co. Inc.
R.R. Street & Co. Inc., et al v. Transport Insurance Company
as 10-55361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.R. STREET & CO. INC. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, individually and as subrogee of R.R. Street & Co. Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
R.R. Street & Co. Inc. et al v. Transport Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv06045
Plaintiff:
R.R. Street & Co. Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. and others
Defendant:
Transport Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Team Enterprises Inc. v. Legacy Vulcan Corp., et al
as 1:2008cv01050
Defendant:
Legacy Vulcan Corp., Century Centers, Ltd, Western Investment Real Estate Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Team Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
California Water Service Company v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03267
Defendant:
Columbia Drycleaning Machines, Legacy Vulcan Corp., PPG Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
California Water Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States Department of Justice vs. Rajendra Jamnadas
as 1:2007cv00491
3Rd Party Defendant:
Legacy Vulcan Corp., Dow Chemical Company, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Defendant:
Rajendra Jamnadas, Stephen C. Lyon, Suzanne S. Lyon and others
Cross Defendant:
Cooper Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
