Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Jose Ramos-Cruz, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1104
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL RAMOS-CRUZ, BIANA AMERICA GIRON-BARRERA DE RAMOS, A. C. R.-G. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO v. RAMOS MOREIRA
as 2:2023cv23283
Plaintiff:
VICTOR H. MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO
Defendant:
LUDIMILA RAMOS MOREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
Ferran v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Ferran, III
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Neil Mitchill, Anthony F. O'Brien and others
Jeidy Posadas-Ramos, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2734
Petitioner:
JEIDY YORLENI POSADAS-RAMOS, H. J. L.-P. and O. E. L.-P.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RAMOS v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
RUTH RAMOS
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Danny Castellanos Ramos v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1816
Petitioner:
DANNY JUNIOR CASTELLANOS RAMOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luis Ramos Sica v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1702
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMOS SICA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
