Cases 1 - 10 of 258
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ramos
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BLANEY v. MIKE et al
as 2:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY
Defendant:
MIKE SCREENER, BERGENFIELD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS, INC, ENRIQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RAMOS RAMIREZ v. EMPIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAMOS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
EMPIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, KALEH MOSTAFA and THERESA SANCHEZ MOSTAFA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO v. RAMOS MOREIRA
as 2:2023cv23283
Plaintiff:
VICTOR H. MEIRELLES DE AZEVEDO
Defendant:
LUDIMILA RAMOS MOREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22067
Plaintiff:
DIONISIO RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
