Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00956
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00737
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00721
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00658
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramos v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ruben Ramos
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2025cv00422
Plaintiff:
Anita Fay Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riles et al v. Prater et al
as 5:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brandon Riles, American Roof Scapes Inc, Oklahoma Modem Inc and others
Defendant:
David Prater, Oklahoma City Police Department, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramos
Defendant:
Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dunbar v. Hammans et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Plaintiff:
Damon Neal Dunbar, Jr
Defendant:
Staci Hunter, Elaina Flores, Ricky McPhearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Holy et al
as 6:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Vladimir Holy, J. Ramos, Mark Wood's and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
