Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04756
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Medrano-Ramos v. United States Of America
as 3:2026cv01949
Plaintiff:
Aleyda Medrano-Ramos
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
State of Texas v. Ramos
as 1:2026cv00781
Petitioner:
Raymundo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04536
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Ramos v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 5:2026cv04490
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ramos
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Kimberly Coffee, Shelly Duglosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Courtyard Management, LLC.
as 5:2026cv04488
Plaintiff:
Graciela Ramos
Defendant:
Courtyard Management, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Amirkhanyan v. Ramos Gutierrez et al
as 7:2026cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ara Amirkhanyan
Defendant:
Beatriz Adriana Ramos Gutierrez and Julio Nunez Dionicio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
