Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Bentz v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrator of Pontiac Correctional Center, JAMES S. BLACKARD, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant and others
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Jesse Montgomery, et al
as 13-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MONTGOMERY, Parole Supervisor/Individual and Official Capacity, RANDALL FLEX, Counselor/Individual and Official Capacity and JOSEPH MATHY, Warden, Previous Director/Individual and Official Capacity
Bentz v. Gish et al
as 1:2012cv01436
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Donald Gish, Vickie Kendrick, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffrey J. Mitchell v. Jesse Montgomery, et al
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MONTGOMERY, RANDALL FLEX and JOSEPH MATHY, Warden
Boyd v. Godinez et al
as 1:2011cv01358
Plaintiff:
John Boyd
Defendant:
SA Godinez, Guy Pierce, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson et al v. Haabs et al
as 1:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilkerson, Sheneka Wilkerson and Yvette Hill
Defendant:
Marge Haabs, Patrick Hastings, Randall Flex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bealer v. Walker et al
as 1:2008cv01377
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bealer
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jackie Miller, Eddie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lovejoy v. Jones et al
as 1:2008cv01171
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, Hardy Marcus, Joseph Mathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Eiler et al
as 1:2008cv01033
Plaintiff:
Brian Stewart
Defendant:
Robert Eiler, Burton Gestner, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
