Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COLBERT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff: LOUIS RANDOLPH COLBERT
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SSA MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Shahid Randolph
as 23-3202
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Shahid Randolph
USA v. Shahid Randolph
as 23-3184
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Shahid Randolph
USA v. Shahid Randolph
as 23-3181
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Shahid Randolph
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant: Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
Nivedita Bondhu v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 23-5163
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nivedita Bondhu
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Paulette Furbert-Harris, Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia and others
J. Sidak v. United States International Trade Commission, et al
as 23-5149
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. Gregory Sidak
Defendant / Appellant: United States International Trade Commission, David S. Johanson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission, Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. International Trade Commission and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?